Essay by Dr. Toshihiro Takami
The Asian Rural Institute (ARI) is a training center in Japan for rural community leaders of all ages, both men and women in about equal numbers. They come from developing countries, mostly in Asia but also from other areas. The aim is for participants to discover for themselves a more desirable image of human community and the practical technical skills for achieving it together.
At ARI we live and work together, producing food from the good earth to support ourselves. For we know by experience that unless we become self-supporting, in staple foodstuffs at least, it is practically impossible for us to gain selfhood or independence. We work extra hard to replenish our land by plowing in tons of organic matter to keep the living soil free from deadly pollution. We prepare our own meals and share and eat together with dignity, joy and peace, trying to come up with a more just and peaceful system of distributing food and other resources for all. We are especially concerned about the farming people who are not able to rightfully share in the fruits of their hard labor, for which they shed their flesh and blood.
BY SHARING WE LIVE
Our motto at ARI is “That We May Live Together.” Participants come to work hard in order to return to their own people to work and live even harder. Not only Protestant and Roman Catholic Christians, but also Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and others share the life at ARI. For we believe the love of God in Jesus Christ is for all peoples and not only for us who confess our faith in Him. In fact we believe that by sharing life with others, we too may have the joy of living ourselves. ARI is a very hard community to live in. Participants come from widely different backgrounds — socially, politically, religiously, culturally. Only those who are strongly motivated, deeply dedicated and experienced leaders come to ARI. Many of them seem to have common characteristics of being strong-minded, power-conscious, quick for action, rather domineering, above average ability and with a high degree of self-esteem.
Each day we go through the difficult process of making corporate decisions — as consensus, not compromise. Each person — man or woman, young or old, rich or poor, strong or weak — has equal right and responsibility to participate. We know “people’s participation in human development” is an indispensable key to realizing justice and peace. But this is easy to say and difficult to practice. Each of us must learn to be a good listener — especially to the poor and weak, the voiceless. At the same time, each person needs to become an articulate but not necessarily an eloquent speaker. Eventually each one learns to be a trustworthy spokesperson of his or her own community, in word and deed.
One of the most critical, painful and difficult experiences each person goes through at ARI is a process of image change. With such a variety of cultural backgrounds and values, the self-images of participants differ greatly. Equally varied are the images they hold of a desirable community. These images are important. They set the limits of what each Participant is going to be. They determine what kind of world he or she will try to build. We often observe Christian leaders consciously or unconsciously assuming an image of a leader according to their own cultural tradition — quite often dictatorial, paternalistic, or in keeping with an image of their former colonial masters.
Many come to ARI with their own images of a training institute. They expect it to be a conventional “academic institution” rather than a community of learning through a process of personal encounter. These Participants suppose that a set of normally accepted subjects in agriculture and social sciences will be taught by experts to students. Instead, what happens is that people have to go through the pain of creating for themselves a community of learning. In the process, each person has to find a new image — quite different form the one they came with.
Pastors, priests, school principals and others often find it very difficult to engage in physical labor — “spoiling” or “dirtying” their hands and knees. They think it is below their dignity to take a shovel or a broom to scrape up chicken or pig dung. Leaders are not supposed to do that: manual labor is below their self-image. Every year we hear some participants murmur, “We did not come to ARI to work in the mud. We came to Japan to study.” People become indignant when their expectations are not met. We need to learn to listen to these indignant murmurs. In this painful process of having our conventional images shattered, we find ourselves emerging with new images — of ourselves, of leadership, life and culture. All this happens as we work together to produce and share food and other resources.
WITH GROANING AND HOPE
In other words, we go through a process of renewal — renewal of ourselves and our community. And in doing so we learn how to stimulate and direct the process of constant renewal in other communities. To be involved in this renewal is to share in the work of creation by God our Father. This process of renewal-creation is painful — we participate in it with groaning and with hope because in the experience of personal encounter we find the One who is the source of life. Here we find a new image of humanity as most clearly shown to us in the person of Jesus Christ — in His life and suffering for others.
We believe all this forms a life-long process of evangelism. For evangelism is a continuing act of proclaiming with our own life and work the Good News that we are ever-renewable people as we painfully participate in the work of God’s creation.
Over 1,200 persons to date have taken part in ARI training activities. Only about 1% have dropped out of the program, usually leaving because of illness or problems at home with work or family. This is largely because we try to avoid the danger of becoming victims of the “growth myth” – that uncritical belief in faster as better; bigger and taller as superior. We do not gear our curriculum to the highest level among the Participants. We do not set our standard at the level of the “best” in the class. RATHER, we go slow but together, so that those members who may be slow in speech and action may also participate fully in the whole life process of the community. In this way we develop the attitude of sharing our life and work together with the poor and hungry, the weak and the voiceless in our rural communities.